Boom Goes the Dynamite

If you haven't seen this video, then you haven't really lived. Okay, that first comment was stupid, and so is this video. Nonetheless, after watching this video for the first time a few years ago, I couldn't stop saying "boom goes the dynamite" for weeks. I hope this video has the same profound and stupefying impact on you.

For the record, this is probably what would happen if I was ever allowed on TV.

Read more...

Galatians 4:1-11 - 4 Reasons Why Following Slavery is Foolish (Part 1)

Remedy Church - 04/26/09

Crucified Christ week 11

This past week, Phud began another two part sermon. He covered the first two reasons why slavery is complete foolishness. I know that our initial instinct is to agree with this statement with a "duh, of course slavery is foolish" type of attitude; however, most of us willfully submit ourselves to slavery every day. If you are without joy, if you have difficulty seeing God as your father, or if you constantly return to a form of "do's and don't's" Christianity, then you are living like a slave. Read these notes, read the text of Galatians 3:25-4:20, and pray over your life.  We all have areas of foolishness, and most of us have at least a little bit of legalism in us.

INTRODUCTORY REMARKS

- The law cannot give you the inheritance

- 3 Reasons it is important that Christ was born under the law

1. Jesus was obligated to keep the law
2. By putting himself under the law, he could be our vicarious substitute
3. So that he would satisfy the requirement of perfect obedience

- We were "redeemed by his blood" - 2 Cor 5:21

4 REASONS (Only the first two this week)

1) Because you are a son, not a slave! God is you Dad! (Gal 4:1-7)

- Remember the prodigal son

- As a believer, you are no longer a slave to sin; rather, you have been adopted into the family of God

- Part of this adoption is God sending the Spirit into our hearts (Jer 17:9)

• Before regeneration, our hearts were dead and dirty
• The heart is the core of our being

* Notice that Paul reverts back to using his heart language when he uses "abba" for father - His emotion cause him to use his first language.

3 Ways we Revert Back to Slavery

1. ADDICTION (remaing/repeated sin)(whatever you struggle with)(Do you look any different than prior to salvation?)
2. GUILT (Underestimating Christ's atoning work)
3. WORSHIP (the lack thereof or worshipping something other than God)(sons worship; slaves work)

- If givng of your time and money or doing evangelism seem like duties rather than delights, then you are living like a slave.

2) Because you are RETURNING to being to being under the slavery of the law again! (Gal 4:8-11)

- Paul seems to be putting paganism (turning back for these Gentiles) and legalism in the same category

- An example of this in our day is moralistic, therepeutic deism

- Notice the emotion when Paul says "I fear that I wasted by efforts" - There is obvious despair, sorrow, and greif

- Do we have Paul's passion for the lost or backsliden?

MY COMMENTS

Paul exemplifies what a shepherd should be.  He not only planted churches and trained leaders, but he also looked after these flocks. One of the primary roles of a shepherd is to protect the sheep from wolves. Unfortunately, sometimes wolves can sneek into the flock undetected by the sheep. Paul refused to allow this flock to be led away and devoured by wolves. Galatians is a letter of protection.

Unfortunately, in American Christianity, most men who attempt to fight against wolves are labeled as trouble-makers or insensitive. Can you imagine Paul's letter to the Galatians being received by a typical American church? He would not have been asked back to preach at their next revival.

Read more...

Introducing Francis Chan

Watch this video of Francis Chan being introduced at the Exponential 09 Conference.

This is definitely one of the coolest intros I have seen. I am going to hire a band to follow me around and do something similar every time I walk into a room.

The best part is that I heard Chan's heartfelt, passionate message was even better than this introduction.

Read more...

Gospel Coalition Media

If you are like me and missed both getting to attend the conference and tuning in to the live webcast, the audio and video content from The Gospel Coalition 2009 National Conference has been made available.

Here are the direct links to each session:

Plenary Sessions

• Tim Keller: The Grand Demythologizer: The Gospel and Idolatry
• John Piper: Feed the Flame of God's Gift: Unashamed Courage in the Gospel
• Phil Ryken: The Pattern of Sound Words
• Mark Driscoll: Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth
• K. Edward Copeland: Shadowlands: Pitfalls and Parodies of Gospel-Centered Ministry
• Bryan Chapell: Preach the Word!
• Ajith Fernando: Gospel-Faithful Mission in the New Christendom
• Panel Discussion: Tim Keller, John Piper, Ligon Duncan and Crawford Loritts
• Ligon Duncan: Finishing Well
• Don Carson: That By All Means I Might Win Some: Faithfulness and Flexibility in Gospel Proclamation

Workshops

• Buster Brown: Preaching in a Christianized Culture
• Graham Cole: Homosexuality and the Bible: Texts, Hermeneutics, and Pastoral Wisdom
• Joshua Harris: Ministering in a Church-Hopping Society
• C.J. Mahaney: The Pastor’s Charge

A note of thanks to the guys at Resurgence, because I stole this formating from them.

Read more...

Galatians 3:15-29 - Law VS. Promise

Remedy Church - 04/19/09

Previously, I had been blogging the sermon from my church each week, but I got slack and missed a couple of weeks. I was out of town on Easter weekend. However, I have no excuse for last week, so I am posting my notes today.  These are the notes from the Sunday before last. I will post my notes from the most recent sermon in a couple of days.  Hopefully I will be able to get back on track.

Remember, you can subscribe to the audio for these sermons by searching for Remedy Church on iTunes, or you can just go the church website.

INITIAL COMMENTS

Are we living for Christ in a way that we are following rules or in a way that we are worshiping? Are you a rule follower or a worshipper?

The law is not meant to add to the gospel, rather it is meant to point you to the gospel.

Most of us are all little legalists at heart – What are the issues you become legalistic about?

5 POINTS REGARDING THE LAW VS. PROMISE

1) The giving of the law doesn’t change the original promise/covenant (Gal 3:15-18)

- God gave the covenant to Abraham in Genesis 12:3

- This covenant – the blessing of all nations through Abraham’s offspring, who is Christ – was not negated or altered by the giving of the law through Moses 400 years later

- The covenant of blessing through Christ was still God’s plan

Then, why even give the law?

 - Paul foresaw this question, so he brings it up

2) The law was given because of sin (Gal 3:19-20)

- The law was actually given to increase transgression / sin (Romans 5:20)

- We didn’t know what sin was until God gave the law to expose our sin

- Also, not only does it expose our sin, but it causes us to want to sin (Romans 4:15; Romans 7:5)

- Our fallen nature causes us to desire the thing we should not do

- In summary, the law clearly defines sin, thereby exposing sin and causing more sin In other words, the law ensures damnation

3) Righteousness cannot be attained by law keeping (Gal 3:21-22)

- There aren’t two ways to God: Faith or Perfect Obedience

- There is only one way to God – receiving grace which results in Faith in Jesus Christ

3 possible responses to the law

1. We can rebel against it

2. We can show complete indifference

3. We can thirst for righteousness

4) The law was our guardian / tutor / schoolmaster until the promise, which is Jesus, came and created justification by faith (Gal 3:23-25)

- The law was both our guide to correct living and the judge declaring us guilty

- It sets the standard, but it is an unattainable goal

- How do you respond to the law?

5) Christ has made us all one (Gal 3:26-29)

- Salvation is available to every people group, gender, age, class, etc.

- These verses are speaking of equality regarding justification

    - Paul is not speaking to the issue of women’s roles

    - Not a support for egalitarianism or complementarianism

- God’s chosen people are those people he regenerates from all nations, not a particular nation or people group (Romans 9:6-8)

- God is looking for worshippers, not law-keepers

- To be an “heir according to the promise,” the only thing required is faith

CONCLUDING THOUGHTS

If we are no longer under the law, put the promise,

- Then, we should be living for Christ, not a set of rules

- Then, our lives, work, actions, and thoughts should be for Christ - We have put on Christ

- Then, our response should be worship

MY THOUGHTS

We are sons of God –

Notice how Paul stated in Galatians 3:26 that we are all “sons of God.”  He doesn’t call us “sons and daughters.”  This isn’t a bad translation or a sexist remark.  His point is that regardless if you are a male or female, when you are adopted by God, you become a Son.  This is because only sons were full heirs.  In other words, only male children received an inheritance, and all Christians receive every benefit of being adopted by God.  We are all full heirs, regardless of race, gender, socio-economic status, or age.  Our justification, adoption, and perfect standing are dependent solely upon his good, accomplished work and grace, not on any of our own characteristics or deeds.

We have put on Christ –

I usually just breeze past this phrase in Galatians 3:26-27, but I recently heard a great discussion of the importance of this phrase.  The NIV translates this phrase; you “have clothed yourselves with Christ.”  For me, this is a mind-blowing concept: to put on and be clothed with Christ.  Personally, I like the passive translation of the NIV, because this is something that is done for us as a part of our justification, not something we have the power to do for ourselves.

I recently heard an illustration that helped me to understand the significance of this phrase. The person was telling the story of young sheep being born and fed. Unfortunately, many mothers and babies would die during the new birth. Therefore, many babies would not have a mother to feed them, and a mother would not allow any sheep to feed unless it was her own newborn.  So, the farmers would skin the dead babies from one mother and put that skin on the baby sheep that no longer had a mother.  This way the mother would smell the newborn and think it was her own.  They were clothed in the skin of that mother’s true offspring.  This was the only way the farmers could keep the other orphaned newborns from starving.

Likewise, we have been clothed with Christ to make us acceptable in God’s sight. We have to take on the appearance of the only acceptable and righteous man, who is Jesus.  His righteousness is imputed to us, so that we might become sons of God.  There is no other way that we can be accepted.

Read more...

Book Review: THE SCANDAL OF THE EVANGELICAL CONSCIENCE

Sider is probably best known for his book Rich Christians In an Age of Hunger, which ranked seventh on Christianity Today’s list of “The Top 50 Books That Have Shaped Evangelicals”. However, The Scandal of the Evangelical Conscience is the only book of Sider’s I have read at the present time, so all of my conclusions will be based solely upon this book, not his overall system of thought, as represented throughout his other works.

This book clearly seeks to identify and address one particular problem within Christianity.  In the Introduction, Sider identifies the problem, as he sees it:

Scandalous behavior is rapidly destroying American Christianity. By their daily activity, most “Christians” regularly commit treason. With their mouths they claim that Jesus is Lord, but with their actions they demonstrate allegiance to money, sex, and self-fulfillment.   

His purpose is to “understand the depth of the crisis, discover why it has happened, and develop obedient, faithful correctives.”   These goals are quite lofty for a relatively short book; I do not think he completely achieves his aim, but he does take his readers most of the way to this end.

The book is compiled of five chapters which represent the structure of the book. Each chapter represents the next step in his process of proclaiming, understanding, and correcting this scandal.  He begins, in the first chapter, by attempting to convince readers that most Christians have strayed from our true calling.  Furthermore, not only have we strayed, but an overall wandering and secularization of the church has become one of the defining characteristics of American Christianity.  He did succeed in thoroughly convincing this reader of these facts.  A simple glance at the divorce rates among church members or the subscription list of most pornography websites will quickly prove his claim.

The second chapter attempts to further illustrate the extent of this scandal by contrasting contemporary American Christianity with the teachings of Christ, the writings of the Apostles, and the practices which characterized the early Christian community.  This comparison is extremely sobering.  The present departure from biblical expectations becomes devastatingly apparent when we read the writings of the Apostles and Early Church Fathers.  Both initial chapters, are not only convicting, but are also very well documented and have proved to be quite useful.

The real work begins in the third and fourth chapters.  Here, he starts assessing how and why the American church has gotten into this scandalous position.  His first and primary assertion is that:

The heart of the problem is a one-sided, unbiblical, reductionist understanding of the gospel and salvation …most evangelicals do not even define the gospel the way Jesus did…we have propagated the heretical notion that people can receive forgiveness without sanctification, heaven without holiness.   

I will firmly join him on this stand; this assertion is undeniably accurate.  Although, I think there is a larger problem at the core of his data.

Next, he claims that American Christianity has followed our present culture in living out a gospel of self-fulfillment in which, “The individual [has] replaced God at the center of reality.”   This has caused Christians to abandon the Bible as their moral compass and despise biblical practices such as Christian accountability and church discipline.  He believes the church has abandoned a New Testament understanding of the church and embraced the process of secularization in which churches are simply “comfortable clubs of conformity” and are destined to become carbon copies of the fallen world.  He calls this blatant heresy.  Once again, while I agree with his conclusions, I also believe there is a prevailing dilemma which should be central to his entire discussion.

Finally, in the culminating chapter, he departs from rebuking and correcting to offer some rays of hope.  This encouraging chapter primarily makes the point that whenever pollsters or researchers have looked past the answers on paper and dug deeper into the lives of profession Christians, there is a much different story to be told.  He believes, and I agree, that there is no way to tell from mere polling alone if a person has truly experienced the new birth that must initiate a Christian life.  He follows George Barna in identifying a subcategory within Christianity, those Christians with a biblical worldview: “Barna has discovered that only 9 percent of all born-again adults have a biblical worldview and only 2 percent of born-again teenagers.”   

One of the major complaints I have with this book, and with Barna’s polling, is this sloppy and probably even heretical use of the label “born-again.”  Born-again is a label created by Jesus himself during his dialogue with Nicodemus in the third chapter of John’s Gospel.  If you read this dialogue, then it is clear that being born-again by the Spirit, putting faith in Christ for salvation, and becoming a new creature are all different descriptions of the same event which initiates the Christian life.  Such a person will be changed and will diligently, albeit imperfectly, strive to live a life modeled after Jesus Christ and the principles set forth in Scripture.  Such a person will look different than the rest of the world.  Despite his misuse of such an important biblical term, what is encouraging about this fact is that, as he proclaims, “the small circle of people with a biblical worldview demonstrate genuinely different behavior.” 

In the end, Sider offers a valid critique of the prevailing version of Christianity that has been created in our present culture.  He clearly proves the stark contrast between what Christianity should look like, according to Scripture, and the lives being lived by the vast majority of Americans who categorize themselves as “born-again Christians.”  Furthermore, he clearly identifies one of primary causes of this predicament: a grievous misunderstanding of the gospel. 

This book should persuade all people who claim the name of Christ to examine our lifestyles, because we have all strayed from our true calling to some degree. However, I would add that the chief factor that must be understood is the fact that the majority of professing Christians are not truly born-again.  This book would be more accurately subtitled Why Are Professing Christians Living Just Like the Rest of the World?  As Jesus stated, “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven” (Matt 7:21)   Our savior also told his disciples that he was the good shepherd and, “he goes before them, and the sheep follow him, for they know his voice.  A stranger they will not follow” (John 10:4-5).  As Christians we are called to be followers of Christ, not mere name-claimers.

Read more...

Book Review: VINTAGE CHURCH

I just finished Mark Driscoll’s newest book, VINTAGE CHURH. It was an enjoyable and beneficial read. I would recommend it to any Christian. I would also recommend it to any non-Christian who is simply curious about this well-known pastor or the explosive growth at Mars Hill Church, in Seattle.

The greatest strength of this book is Driscoll’s transparency regarding the practices of Mars Hill Church. He clearly lays out the practices of the church and the reasons for those practices. This aspect of the book will prove to be extremely valuable to church planters and young leaders. Even if you don’t agree with every structure or practice at Mars Hill, you will at least be forced to think through all of these issues. Some of the issues that I found most useful were his section on the process of appointing elders, women in ministry, multi-site practices, the Lord’s Supper, and baptism.

Another strength of this book is learning from Driscoll’s experience in planting and growing churches over the past twelve years. He planted Mars Hill with a few other people and grew it into one of the largest churches in America. This knowledge combined with his experience as the founder of the Acts 29 church planting network amount to a lot of valuable advice for pastors and planters. He knows what it is like to lead a church at every stage of a church’s life-cycle.

As you can tell, I learned a lot from this book; however, do not mistake this book for a full-blown ecclesiology. Driscoll hits most of the high points, but really camps out in the areas that he has the most to say about; this is obvious by the fact that the chapter discussing “What is the Church?” is the same length as the chapter discussing multi-site churches.

Overall, any pastor, elder, planter, or church member will benefit from this collection of Driscoll’s beliefs, practices, and experiences. Also, this book does contain much of the vintage Driscoll humor, but nothing that crosses the line into vulgar or inappropriate territory. I know this is a concern for many people, but I hope this book and his last effort, Death by Love, represent a maturing Mark Driscoll. I welcome more of his insightful experience.

Here are a few of my favorite quotes:

Jesus' ministry included feeding the hungry, healing the sick, loving the outcast, and befriending the sinner.  But we must never forget that Jesus's ministry began with preaching. (88)

For us as missionaries in culture, the tip of the spear for our war against Satan, sin, and death is the sermon, if rightly preached with authority for the purpose of gathering God's people for instruction before sending them out on mission with passion. (101)

Pursuing potential rather than calling gets a church off mission... Bluntly stated, most churches are doing too much and doing it poorly.  To get and stay unified, church leaders must focus their resources (e.g., people, dollars, facilities, emotion, technology) on accomplishing a few things [we must remain gospel-centered] if they hope to accomplish anything. (146-47)

In the days of Nehemiah, God's people rebuilt the wall encircling their city with a trowel in one hand and a sword in another.  With the trowel they built, and with the sword they defended [to paraphrase his next few sentences, this means that today in our time, we must both build the church and defend it]... In keeping with this analogy, formative discipline [teaching and training] is trowel work and resotrative discipline [church discipline, which means correction and casting out wolves] is sword work. (171-72)

Because we have limited resources (time, energy, money) we must allocate those things to what we consider most important or glorious to us and in so doing make sacrifices for our functional god.  Whatever we hold in the position of highest glory is by definition our god(s). (204) [The goal is to have Christ in this position]

[One problem according to Driscoll is that many churches have] slipped into an attritional ministry philosophy focused almost solely on bringing people into church buildings and events. Such churches lacked a missional philosphy focused on sending Christians out of the church into the world to evangelize and disciple people. Subsequently, the Western church had, sadly, become overly attached to and defined by buildings, programs, staff, services, and institutions that only strategize ways to do "attractional" ministry. To correct this problem, the term missional was adopted to emphasize that the church exists to go into the cultures and nations of the earth and live sacrificially for the good of others. (218)

[Regarding large or multi-campus churches] If some churches with good names in their community can multiply and use their good name to compel more people to worship Jesus, then even if you do not consider that ideal, it is better than unknown, empty churches, which are so common. (260)

To begin with, before worrying about how to distribute gospel content, you must have good content and lots of it.  Just as it makes no sense for a horrible band to play on an expensive sound system because it only amplifies the awfulness, so increasing the channels for content distribution is in vain if the content (e.g., preaching, teaching, worship music) is not biblical and well done. (273)

Read more...

Rob Bell's Recent Interview

I am trying to be more disciplined to only judge the correctness of people’s words, not the content of their character. With that said, Rob Bell seems like a very entertaining and enjoyable person, but his teaching is very lacking. Primarily, it is lacking the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

The lack of the Gospel in his teaching is glaringly apparent in his recent interview with Christianity Today. You should read the entire interview, because in the second half of the conversation, the interviewer seems to be deliberately trying to get Rob Bell to talk about the Gospel. Rob Bell of course manages to side step any mention of the cross or atonement.

I don’t understand how a pastor can purposefully avoid talking about the most central component of Christianity (really, the most significant event in human history). Christianity cannot exist apart from the cross of Christ.

Which leaves me with this question: Can we put the label of “Christianity” on what Rob Bell teaches? Can the content of his message be considered “Christian”?

Another way of asking this question is, If someone wants to be a part of a conversation, and tries to stay within a safe distance of the norms of that conversation, but completely misses the main point of the conversation, then are they even in the conversation at all? Or, are they just rambling about something else that seems vaguely related?

I do not want to simply bash on Rob Bell. I do want to cause Christians to consider what Christianity is supposed to be about. The cross of Christ and the Gospel (our sin and Christ's atoning work in our place) are central to Christianity. To lose this is to lose all hope for salvation. We cannot be justified by our good deeds in the community or around the world.

Read more...

Who's Your Pastor?

Every single church member needs to read THIS ARTICLE by Dan Phillips. He makes a great point that every Christian needs to hear, especially those of us who read books and listen to podcasts (which should be every Christian, but that is another discussion).

I have learned so much from John Piper, D.A. Carson, Tim Keller, Al Mohler, Mark Driscoll, Matt Chandler, and many others, but none of these men are my pastor. I don't attend Bethlehem Baptist or Mars Hill. These men don't know me or my family. These men don't have to be annoyed by me on a weekly basis.

It isn't fair to my pastor if I compare him with these men I have only heard or read, and it certainly isn't loving or gracious. There are many of us who need to listen to this warning concerning "paper pastors." It was a reminder to me that I need to love, serve, and protect my pastor, not compare him to these well known preachers and teachers.

If, while you read this post, you were thinking, "but, my pastor is terrible," then you need to repent for sure. Also, if your assessment is accurate, then you may need to find another church. Either way, begin with repentance. Then, either help your pastor to improve by trying to humbly assist him or find another church. Staying at a church and being a malcontent isn't good for anyone, and it is a terrible representation the gospel.

Read more...

Great Commission Resurgence within the SBC

Following up my last post regarding the current public perception of the Southern Baptist Convention, I want to recommend this recent chapel sermon at SEBTS (Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary). A friend directed me to this sermon that Dr. Aiken preached about a week ago. It was very encouraging. If you don't have the proper plugin to view the video above (it's a strange one), then you can watch the video HERE or read the full manuscript HERE.

If you are part of the Southern Baptist Convention, then you need to watch, listen to, or read this sermon.

Read more...